Kinda troubling this notion % saying yes meaning NO!, and vice-versa % Too many odd steps in the gamble, and soon it turns frustrating ¡ ¡

             

Not to mention:

– Endless questions unresolved.
– On free initiative.
– On roles and responsibilities.
– On constitutional warranties.
– On laws and lawyers.

::: 1 / 8 :::

Not to mention:

– Quoted for ideas, not true ideas.
– On defamation.
– On what is a fact and what is not a fact.
– On someone's ignorance
  about what is a fact
  and what is not a fact.
– On believing what anyone says.
– On believing what corporations say.
– On being forced to believe.

::: 2 / 8 :::

Not to mention:

– Wrong classification, what do you think about that?
– Wrong classification, wrong results.
– Gimme a chance, I show you the answer : NO!

::: 3 / 8 :::

Not to mention:

– Hello, and Number Required Different Department(s).
– Hello Departments, and no possible solution.

– On embarrassment.
– On obstruction of justice.
– On press freedom.
– On fact checking.
– On spamming.

::: 4 / 8 :::

Not to mention:

– Hear the track and type ( Nº ) following circumstances.
  No solution, turn out the conversation.
– On probatory elements – access and analysis.
– On audio recorders and recordings.

::: 5 / 8 :::

– On judicial secrets.
– On privacy.
– On state investigations.
– On private investigations.
– On espionage.

– On public knowledge.
– On bad faith.

::: 6 / 8 :::

– On the best public interest.
– On the associates interest.
– On accountancy methods.
– On working rights and warranties.
– On protesting, on management, on homologation.

::: 7 / 8 :::

– Not sharing your information with people you don't know.
– Not sharing your information with people you can't meet.

::: 8 / 8 :::