Generic conversations, and cases in specific. Fortunately, there are also many other aspects, issues and interests to be taken into consideration ¹ ² ³.

/ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / X / 1 / 2 / 3...

For better, trying better solutions. Although this ain't supposed to be a historical review from the 1830's on, as documents exist, for more appropriate interpretations. [...] Lack of public interest for the very historical events, however, produces a series of conflicts and paradoxes, first in the ideological dimension, and then in the direct political dimension.

Trying to have a positive perception of reality. A job is a job, to be done for what it's worth. Not trying to have a bad day – for fashion, for history, for literature, for journalism.

If controversies exist in times of trouble, finding the original documentation is essential. Because for serious journalism, there is more to be done, than just expecting that things would happen this or that way; than making sure by repetition, that one interpretation, amongst so many others, is the one and only interpretation of facts and things.

A or B stupid. What about your time being into that situation. In those situations. Not sure anymore, about what is just meant to be a sensationalistic exaggeration, and what actually is a big historical problem.

Politics can have a big turn, this is one fact of life. One time it's the candidate, another time it's the vice-president. Same as before the emperor, there was another emperor. You never know. When starting from publicity, correspondence and broadcasting, better do your things good.