1 if the incredible part is, telling the story o' the 20th century best ways.

2 better think well, on publicity and campaigns, cause no matter the intention, good or bad, good intentions only, it's not taken for just an idea, opinion, interpretation anymore. An irresponsible quote? What?  press freedom?

3 social networks and the end of privacy may give people the impression that third-parties are second-parties. So right or wrong, thinking twice the next time, cause it may have consequences, even without intention, at all. Especially if one issue is not about fancy, fictional controversies for distraction. Have mercy, Alfred. don't keep replying cause they don't want your opinions. saying and denying what was said isn't a good deal; just asking other people about it, and would they always pretend it's not understood 4 5 6 7 8 9? Like the entire internet under surveillance by governments, not necessarily for good purposes and statistics today. it is not that influential, is it? Moment all start going paranoiac about it, no way, not intended. Bibliographies, quotations? Demography? Polls? Referendums? Artificial Intelligence? Elections and Governance Programs? I like it, I don't like it. It's another thing, another issue. I agree, I disagree, I just don't know. Versus diversity and constitutional democracies around the global village. Gonna remember that next job interview(s). not having politics, bills, reforms or work to wonder about, right? send a postcard one time soon, cause this conversation is about to end forever, and never. Plus no third-party misuse and misunderstanding of information is intended, seriously. Just ethical practices. But anyway, better be providing valid documentation, contracts, lists and complete inventories of companies; and also complete financial demonstrations, budgets and standard price projections for everything. And contracts, lawyers, interviews, charts, translations, videos and copies. Lotta work for ethics and responsibility.